When the professor sprung the idea of the class determining their own fate on the curve or any variation of it as well as determining the future format of the exam I was confounded. I literally thought it was a joke, scam, maniacal scheme. Professors in Baruch aren’t that lenient or forgiving on midterms let alone let us determine our outcome. I personally looked at this situation from an withdrawn standpoint because of my disbelief in the outcome and also in some part I was content with the grade I had received. The class on the other hand was engaged in a spitfire of ideas and thoughts. Every few seconds for the initial minutes idea were proclaimed and written on the chalkboard. One student had taken charge and was guiding the attention among my classmates which wished to speak. It gave order to the potential chaos that could have erupted. Once the room was devoid of any further ideas we solicited any “nays” of the idea which would have voided it from our final vote due to the professor’s cardinal rule. Which was that it would have to be a 100 percent consensus if we as a class wanted to have any change on the test. We unfortunately at the end weren’t able to reach a unanimous vote on any single idea in the end in which time we opted to forge three different ideas together for the pure sake of achieving any kind of result. We used the methods of compromise, which is that every single class member was able to voice his/her voice on the public platform, and also the accommodation method in the very end when time was running out. We chose to think of the big picture and get any result that was possible instead of no result.
Now knowing what I know about the reactions and mind frames of my classmates and the truth in the experiment in reference to the legitimate outcome I would have chosen to use the method of collaboration in conjunction with compromise and accommodation. Collaboration can split up the class into separate groups in which they could brainstorm worthwhile ideas and since there are fewer people in the group than the class it would be a safe haven for the individual with the idea and not a pressure cooker. It would be the most efficient way to organize the time and effort of the class. Break the elements down, in this case the class, understand and evualate the problem, and then reunite and discuss the solutions you found out in a group. I believe that most groups would have come to similar solutions and therefore the unity between them would have been easily formed. Consensus can be more easily reached if a majority of the players are in cohesion about their ideas.
Unbelievable Truth
11 months ago